Journal of New Advances in Educational Management

Journal of New Advances in Educational Management

Developing the coding method of teaching English vocabulary and comparing it with the traditional teaching method on students' English vocabulary learning

Document Type : Original Article

Author
PhD in Educational Psychology, Lecturer, Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Management, Imam Ali University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
language is the most primitive and at the same time the most advanced means of communication between humans, which enables the transfer of meaning. Therefore, the present study was conducted with the aim of developing the coding method of language vocabulary teaching and comparing it with the traditional teaching method on the learning of English vocabulary in students of Imam Ali University. This research is of an applied type in terms of its purpose and in terms of a mixed method, which consists of two qualitative and quantitative parts. The statistical population was first year university students. The statistical sample included 25 people for each of the experimental and control groups; which were randomly selected and replaced in experimental and control groups. The teacher taught 120 words from the book of 504 words to the students of two experimental groups using two coding and traditional methods (Lightner box and using flash cards) during three two-hour sessions for each method. While no training was given to the control group. After the completion of the training, all three groups were given a post-test. Data were analyzed using repeated measures analysis of variance. The results showed that both traditional teaching methods and coding had a significant effect on vocabulary learning compared to the control group, and compared to the traditional method and coding, the coding method had better results. The results were repeated in the three-month follow-up. Therefore, it is possible to increase the learning performance while shortening the learning time by using the Kering teaching method
Keywords

AhmadiSafa, M., & Hamzawi, R. (2013). The effect of the mnemonic keyword method on vocabulary And long-term retention. Journal of English language teaching and learning 12, 1-15.
Atkinson, R.c. (1975). Mnemotechniques in second language learning. American Psychologist,30(2),821-828. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077029
Avila, E., & Sadoski, M. (1996). Exploring new applications of the keyword method to acquire English vocabulary. Language Learning, 46(3), 379–395.
Bulgren, J. A., Schumaker, J. B., & Deshler, D. D. (1994). The effects of a recall enhancement routine on the test performance of secondary students with and without learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice. 9(1), 2–11.
Cohen, A. (1987). The use of verbal and imagery mnemonics in second language vocabulary learning. Studies in second language learning,9(1),43-62.
Eftekhari, Hojjat; Malekabadi, Maryam. (2018). Improving the teaching of the distributive property of multiplication and meaningful learning using the pre-organizing teaching model (lesson research). Educational Research Quarterly, 5 (18), 1-18.
Gholami, Fatima; Arefi, Mahbobe; Fathi Vajargah, Korosh and Abolghasemi, Mahmoud. (2016). The challenges of teaching English in Iran's educational system from the point of view of educational managers and English teachers. New Approaches in Educational Management, 8(2), 1-30.
Gians & Redman (1986), Hearing in children, 4th edition, Lippincott Williams Wilkins 530 walnut street, Philadelphia Pennsylvania 19106-3621 u.s .a. Page-11,305,226,239,260.
Levin, J. R. (1993). Mnemonic strategies and classroom learning: A twenty-year report card. The Elementary School Journal, 94(2), 235–244.
Mayer, R. E. (2012). Multimedia learning. University of California, Santa Barbara.
 Mengistie, S. M. (2019). Tension between keyword method and root analysis in teaching vocabulary recall: Addis Kidam General Secondary and Preparatory School in Focus, Awi Zone, Amhara Region, Ethiopia. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 11(1), 23–42.
Naeimi, M & Chow, V. F. T. A Comparison of Vocabulary Learning Strategies of Iranian EFL University Students: Repeating versus Cooperating with Peers. English Language Teaching, 7(7), 102-107.
Nouri Shirazi, Zahra; Ghanbari Hamidabadi, Mahdia; Alipour, Zainab and Hashemi, Atefeh Al-Sadat. (2023). Investigating the impact of Azobel's theory concept map in preventing academic failure and learning deterioration in the era of Corona. New Approach Quarterly in Educational Sciences, 3(2), 22-26. [in Persian]
Paivio, A (1971). Imagery and verbal processes, p 7-32. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Pressley, M., Levin, J. R., & Miller, G. E. (1981). The keyword method and children's learning of foreign vocabulary with abstract meanings. Canadian Journal of Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie, 35(3), 283–287.
Qaraghaji, Saeed; Razavieh, Asghar. (2000). Comparison of short-term and long-term fluency in learning English-Persian associative pairs using keyword and repetition methods. Master's thesis.
Richards, J.C. & Renandya, W.A. (2002). Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Roediger, H.L. 1980.The effectiveness of four mnemonics in ordering recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6(5), 558-567.
Saif, Ali Akbar. (2011). Modern educational psychology. Tehran Publications: Duran.
Salaripour, Ismail; Vahid Sarrigani, Narges; Sarrigani Vahedi, Sharifa. (2023). The effect of the pre-organizer teaching method on the academic progress of the social studies course and social skills of the first year high school students. A New Approach Quarterly in Educational Sciences, 4 (3), 15-25. [in Persian]
Taheri, A. A., & Davoudi, M.  (2016). The effect of the keyword method  on vocabulary learning and long-term retention. International journal of language and linguistics, 3(1), 2374-8850.
Targhee, Hossein (2016), comparing the effectiveness of V-coding, T-coding and Leitner methods on students' English vocabulary learning. The third world conference of psychology and educational sciences, law and social sciences at the beginning of the third millennium. [in Persian]
Thompson, I. (1987) Memory in Language Learning. In: Wenden, A. and Rubin, J., Eds., Learner Strategies in Language Learning, Prentice Hall, New York, 43-56.
Yates, F. A. (1966). The Art of Memory. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.     https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342424850

  • Receive Date 09 April 2024
  • Revise Date 22 April 2024
  • Accept Date 09 June 2024
  • Publish Date 21 June 2024