Aldon, G., Cusi, A., Morselli, F., Panero, M., & Sabena, C. (2015). Which support technology can give to mathematics formative assessment? The FaSMEd project in Italy and France. Quaderni di Ricerca in Didattica (Mathematics), 25, 631-641.
Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S. & Silverstein, M. (1977). A pattern language: towns, buildings, construction. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Alizadeh, Shahnaz; Salehi, Keyvan; Moghadamzadeh, Ali (2016). Analyzing the quality of classroom assessment of teachers; A mixed research study. Quarterly journal of research in school and virtual learning, number 17, year 5, page 63-84.
American Educational Research Association; Joint Committee on Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (U.S.); American Psychological Association; National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
ARG (Assessment Reform Group). (2002). Assessment for learning: Ten principles. http://www.hkeaa.edu.hk/DocLibrary/ SBA/HKDSE/Eng_DVD/doc/Afl_principles.pdf Accessed 4 February, 2020.
ATC21S. (2014). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills: Collaborative problem solving empirical progressions.http://www.atc21s.org/uploads/3/7/0/0/37007163/collaborative_problem_solving_emprical_progressions_v1.1.pdf Accessed 13 February, 2020.
Baker, R.S., Goldstein, A.B., & Heffernan, N.T. (2011). Detecting learning moment by moment. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 21(1-2), 5-25.
Barrett, B.S., Moran, A.L., & Woods, J.E. (2014). Meteorology meets engineering: An interdisciplinary STEM module for middle and early secondary school students. International Journal of STEM Education, 1(6).
Beesley, A.D., Clark, T.F., Dempsey, K., & Tweed, A. (2018). Enhancing formative assessment practice and encouraging middle school mathematics engagement and persistence. School Science & Mathematics, 118(1), 4-16.
Bennett, R.E. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, and Practice, 18(1), 5-25.
Bergin, J., Kohls, C., Köppe, C., Mor, Y., Portier, M., Schümmer, T., & Warburton, S. (2015). Assessment-Driven Course Design - Fair Play Patterns. In Proceedings of the 22nd Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs. The Hillside Group.
Bicer, A., Capraro, R.M., & Capraro, M.M. (2017). Integrated STEM assessment model. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3959-3968.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: principles, policy & practice, 5(1), 7-74.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in Education: principles, policy, & practice, 25(6), 551-575.
Burkhardt, H., & Schoenfeld, A. (2019). Formative assessment in mathematics. In H. Andrade, R.E. Bennett, & G. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment in the disciplines (pp. 35-67). New York, NY: Routledge.
Burns, M.K., Klingbeil, DA., & Ysseldyke, J. (2010). The effects of technology-enhanced formative evaluation on student performance on state accountability math tests. Psychology in the Schools, 47(6), 582-591.
Canty, D., Seery, N., Hartell, E., & Doyle, A. (2017). Integrating peer assessment in technology education through adaptive comparative judgement. Paper presented at Pupils’ Attitudes Toward Technology (PATT-34) Conference. Philadelphia, PA.
Care, E., Griffin, P., & Wilson, M. (Eds.). (2018). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills. Research and applications. Dordrecht: Springer.
Cherner, T., & Smith, D. (2017). Reconceptualizing TPACK to meet the needs of twenty-first-century education. The New Educator, 13(4), 329-349.
Cowie, B., Moreland, J., & Otrel-Cass, K. (2013). Expanding notions of assessment for learning inside science and technology primary classrooms. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Crompton, H., Burke, D., & Lin, Y. (2019). Mobile learning and student cognition: A systematic review of PK-12 research using Bloom’s Taxonomy. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 684–701.
Czaja, S. J., Charness, N., Fisk, A. D., Hertzog, C., Nair, S. N., Rogers, W. A., & Sharit, J. (2006). Factors predicting the use of technology: findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE). Psychology and Aging, 21(2), 333–352.
Decristan, J., Klieme, E., Kunter, M., Hochweber, J. Büttner , G., Fauth, B., Hondrich, A.L., Rieser, S., & Hardy, I. (2015). Embedded formative assessment and classroom process quality: How do they interact in promoting science understanding? American Educational Research Journal, 52(6), 1133-1159.
Dolin J., Black P., Harlen W., & Tiberghien A. (2018). Exploring relations between formative and summative assessment. In: Dolin J., Evans R. (Eds.), Transforming assessment through an interplay between practice, research and policy. Contributions from science education research (pp. 53-80). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Dolin, J., & Evans, R. (Eds.). (2018). Transforming assessment through an interplay between practice, research and policy.Contributions from science education research. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Dukuzumuremyi, S., & Siklander, P. (2018). Interactions between pupils and their teachers in collaborative and technologyenhanced learning settings in the inclusive classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 76, 165-174.
Dunn, K.,. & Mulvenon, S. (2009). A critical review of research on formative assessment: The limited scientific evidence of the impact of formative assessment in education. Practical Assessment, Research, & Evaluation, 14(7), 1-11.
Duschl, R. (2019). Learning progressions: framing and designing coherent sequences for STEM Education. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(4). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0005-x Accessed 4 February, 2020.
Economou, A. (2018). ATS2020-Assessment of transversal skills: Reflections and policy recommendations on transversal skills development and assessment. http://www.ats2020.eu/images/documents/ATS2020-Reflections.pdf Accessed 13 February, 2020.
ETS (Educational Testing Service) (nd.). What are learning progressions and why are they important? https://news.ets.org/ stories/what-are-learning-progressions-and-why-are-they-important/ Accessed 4 February, 2020.
European Commission. (2016). FaSMEd summary report. https://cordis.europa.eu/docs/results/612/612337/final1-finalfasmed- summary-report-final.pdf Accessed 4 February, 2020.
Faber, J.M., Luyten, H., & Visscher, A.J. (2017). The effects of a digital formative assessment tool on mathematics achievement and student motivation: Results of a randomized experiment. Computers & Education, 106, 83-96.
Feldman, A., & Capobianco, B.M. (2008). Teacher learning of technology enhanced formative assessment. Journal of Science Education Technology, 17, 82-99.
Finlayson ,O., & McLoughlin, E. (2017) Building teacher confidence in inquiry and assessment: Experiences from a Pan- European Collaboration In M. Peters, B. Cowie, & I. Menter (Eds.). A companion to research in teacher education (pp. 825-838). Singapore: Springer.
Furtak, E.M., Heredia, S.C., & Morrison, D. (2019). Formative assessment in science education: Mapping a shifting terrain. In H. Andrade, R.E. Bennett, & G. Cizek (Eds.). Handbook of formative assessment in the disciplines (pp. 97-125). New York, NY: Routledge.
Gail Morreim, J. (2016). How Digital Formative Assessment Increases student Achievment and Motivation. Saint Paul.Minnesota: Hamline University.
Geer, R., White, B., Zeegers, Y., Au, W., & Barnes, A. (2017). Emerging pedagogies for the use of iPads in schools. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 490-498.
Gholtash, Abbas; Ojinejad, Ahmadreza; Dehghan Mangabadi, Alireza (2014). Pathology of the descriptive evaluation model in order to provide a suitable model in the elementary school. Quarterly Journal of Research in Educational and Virtual Learning, 10th issue, 3rd year, page 7-16.
Griffin, P., & Care, E. (Eds.). (2015). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills: Methods and approaches. Dordrecht: Springer.
Griffin, P., McGaw, B., & Care, E. (Eds.). (2012). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills. Dordrecht: Springer.
Grundschober, I., Ghoneim, A., Baumgartner, P., & Gruber-Mücke, T. (2018). A pattern language remix for ATS2020. Using existing pedagogical patterns to create a new language for formative assessment within the ATS2020 learning model.
Harris, J., Phillips, M., Koehler, M., & Rosenberg, J. (2017). TPCK/TPACK research and development: Past, present, and future directions. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(3), i-viii.
Haßler, B., Major, L., & Hennessy, S. (2016). Tablet use in schools: A critical review of the evidence for learning outcomes. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(2), 139-156.
Hatlevik, O. E., Guðmundsdóttir, G. B., & Loi, M. (2015). Examining factors predicting students’ digital competence. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 14, 123-137.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
Hayward, L. (2015). Assessment is learning: the preposition vanishes. Assessment in Education: principles, policy & practice, 22(1), 27-43.
Hickey, D.T., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Cross, D. (2012). Assessment as learning: enhancing discourse, understanding, and achievement in innovative science curricula. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(10), 1240-1270.
Hmelo-Silver, C.E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235-266.
Hondrich, A.L., Decristan, J., Hertel, S., & Klieme, E. (2018). Formative assessment and intrinsic motivation: The mediating role of perceived competence. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 21, 717-734.
Hooker, T. (2017). Transforming teachers’ formative assessment practices through ePortfolios. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 440-453.
http:// www.hillside.net/plop/2015/papers/panthers/4.pdf Accessed 13 February, 2020.
In R. Sickinger, P. Baumgartner, & T. Gruber-Mücke (Eds.). Pursuit of pattern languages for societal change. A comprehensive perspective of current pattern research and practice (pp. 288–317). Krems: Tredition.
Jennings, L.B. (2010). Inquiry-based learning. In T.C. Hunt, J.C. Carper, T.J. Lasley II, & D. Raisch. Encyclopedia of Educational Reform and Dissent. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Jönsson, A. (2020). Definitions of formative assessment need to make a distinction between a psychometric understanding of assessment and “evaluate judgements.” Frontiers In Education, 5(2), 1-4.
Khanifar, Hossein; (Spring 2015). Designing an entrepreneurial process model in Iran's food industry. Entrepreneurship Development, 9th, 219-237.
Khodadahosseini, Seyyed Hamid. (Spring 2013). Designing an entrepreneurial branding process model in small and medium businesses in the food industry. Brand Management Quarterly, 1, 13-45.
Kimbell, R. (2012). Evolving project e-scape for national assessment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 22(2), 135-155.
Kimbell, R., Wheeler, T., Miller, S., & Pollitt, A. (2007). E-scape portfolio assessment: Phase 2 report. Goldsmiths, University of London.
Kingston, N., & Nash, B. (2011). Formative assessment: A meta-analysis and call for research. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30(4), 28-37.
Kippers, W.B., Wolterinck, C.H.D., Schildkamp, K., Poortman, C.L., & Visscher, A.J. (2018). Teachers’ views on the use of assessment for learning and data-based decision making in classroom practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 199-213.
Kirschner P.A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R.E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86.
Kirschner, P.A., & De Bruyckere, P. (2017). The myths of the digital natives and the multitasker. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 135-142.
Knowles, T.R., & Kelley, J.G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(11), 1-11.
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.
Laal, M. (2013). Collaborative learning; elements. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83, 814-818.
Lai, C. (2019). Trends of mobile learning: A review of the top 100 highly cited papers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50. doi:10.1111/bjet.12884 Accessed 4 February, 2020
Larson, K.A., Trees, F.P., & Weaver, D.S. (2008). Continuous Feedback Pedagogical Patterns. In PLoP’08 Proceedings of the 15th Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs. New York, NY: ACM. Retrieved from: http://hillside.net/plop/2008/ papers/PLoP2008_26_Larson+Trees+Weaver.pdf
Lashkar-Blouki, (fall and winter 2011). Designing a sustainable strategy process model using a hybrid approach. Strategic Management Thought, 6th, 121-151.
Lee, H., Feldman, A., & Beatty, I.D. (2012). Factors that affect science and mathematics teachers’ initial implementation of technology-enhanced formative assessment using a classroom response system. Journal of Science Education Technology, 21, 523-539.
Looney, J. (2019). Digital formative assessment: A review of the literature.
Looney, J. (2019). Digital formative assessment: A review of the literature. http://www.eun.org/documents/411753/817341/ Assess%40Learning+Literature+Review/be02d527-8c2f-45e3-9f75-2c5cd596261d Accessed 4 December, 2019.
Lysaght, Z., & O’Leary, M. (2017). Scaling up, writ small: using an assessment for learning audit instrument to stimulate site-based professional development, one school at a time. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 24(2), 271-289.
Maier, W., Wolfe, N., & Randler, C. (2016). Effects of a computer-assisted formative assessment intervention based on multiple-tier diagnostic items and different feedback types. Computers & Education, 95, 85-98.
Marjan Faber, J. (2020). Effect of digital formative assessment tools on teaching quality and student achievement. PhD Thesis, University of Twente.
Martin, M.O., Mullis, I.V.S., & Foy, P. (2017). TIMSS 2019 Assessment Design. In I.V.S. Mullis & M. O. Martin (Eds.), TIMSS 2019 Assessment Frameworks (pp. 79-91).
McGarr, O., & McDonagh, A. (2019). Digital competence in teacher education, Output 1 of the Erasmus+ funded Developing Student Teachers’ Digital Competence (DICTE) project. https://dicte.oslomet.no/ Accessed 13 February, 2020.
McMillan, J; Cauley, K. (2010). Formative assessment techniques to support student motivation and achievement. Educational strategies, 83(1), 1-6.
Meusen-Beekman, K., Joosten-ten Brinke, D., & Boshuizen, H.P.A. (2015). Developing young adolescents’ self-regulation by means of formative assessment: A theoretical perspective. Cogent Education, 2(1), 1071233.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for integrating technology in teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
Molenaar, I., Horvers, A., & Baker, R. S. (2019). What can moment-by-moment learning curves tell about students’ selfregulated learning?. Learning and Instruction, 101206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.05.003. Accessed 4 February, 2020.
Moss, C.M., & Brookhart, S. (2019). Advancing formative assessment in every classroom: A guide for instructional leaders.Alexandria, VA: ASCD Publications.
Ng, W. (2012). Empowering scientific literacy through digital literacy and multiliteracies. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
Nikou, S.A., & Economides, A.A. (2018). Mobile-based assessment: A literature review of publications in major refered journals from 2009 to 2018. Computers & Education, 125, 101-119.
Nikou, S.A., & Economides, A.A. (2019). Factors that influence behavioral intention to use mobile-based assessment: A STEM teacher’s perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 587-600.
O’Leary, M., Scully, D., Karakolidis, A., & Pitsia, V. (2018). The state of the art in digital technology based assessment. European Journal of Education, 53(2), 160-175.
Orr, G. (2010). A review of literature in mobile learning: Affordances and constraints. Paper presented at the 6th IEEE International Conference on Wireless, Mobile, and Ubiquitous Technologies in Education, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5476544 Accessed 13 February, 2020.
Panero, M., & Aldon, G. (2016). How teachers evolve their formative assessment practices when digital tools are involved in the classroom. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 2, 70-86.
Pinger, P., Rakoczy, K., Besser, M., & Klieme, E. (2018). Implementation of formative assessment – effects of quality of programme delivery on students’ mathematics achievement and interest. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(2), 160-182.
promising practices for enhancing accessibility for students with disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 33(4), 219-236.
Quellmalz, E.S., Davenport, J.L., Timms, M.J., DeBoer, G.E., Jordan, K.A., Huang, C., & Buckley, B.C. (2013). Next-generation environments for assessing and promoting complex science learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(4), 1100- 1114.
Reynolds, Katherine;et al. (2020). Digital Formative Assessment of Transversal Skills STEM. Dublin City University: ISBN: 978-1-911669-05-0.
Ruiz-Primo, M.A., & Furtak, E.M. (2006). Informal formative assessment and scientific inquiry: Exploring teachers’ practices and student learning. Educational Assessment, 11(3), 205-235.
Ryoo, K., & Linn, M.C. (2016). Designing automated guidance for concept diagrams in inquiry instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(7), 1003-1035.
Sadler, D.R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119-144.
Scalise, K., Irvin, P.S., Alresheed, F., Zvoch, K., Yim-Dockery, H., Park, S., Landis, B., Meng, P., Kleinfelder, B., Halladay, L., & Partsafas, A. (2018). Accommodations in digital interactive STEM assessment tasks: Current accommodations and
Seery, N., Canty, D., & Phelan, P. (2012). The validity and value of peer assessment using adaptive comparative judgement in design driven practical education. International Journal of Technology Design Education, 22, 205-226.
Shavelson, R.J., Young, D.B., Ayala, C.C., Brandon, P.R., Furtak, E.M., Ruiz-Primo, M.A., Tomita, M.K., & Yin,Y. (2008). On the impact of curriculum-embedded formative assessment on learning: A collaboration between curriculum and assessment developers. Applied Measurement in Education, 21(4), 295-314.
Shute, V.J., & Rahimi, S. (2017). Review of computer-based assessment for learning in elementary and secondary education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33, 1-19.
Shute, V.J., Leighton, J.P., Jang, E.E., & Chu, M. (2016). Advances in the science of assessment. Educational Assessment, 21(1), 34-59.
Sireci, S.G., & Zenisky, A.L. (2006). Innovative item formats in computer-based testing: In pursuit of improved construct representation. In S.M. Downing & T.M. Haladyna (Eds.), Handbook of test development (pp. 329-348). New York, NY: Routledge.
Spante, M., Hashemi, S., Lundin, M., & Algers, A. (2018). Digital competence and digital literacy in higher education research: Systematic review of concept use. Cogent Education, 5, 1-21.
Spector, J.M., Ifenthaler, D., Sampson, D., Yang, L., Mukama, E., Warusavitarana, A., Dona, K.L., Eichorn, K., Fluck, A., Huang, R., Bridges, S., Lu, J., Ren, Y., Gui, X., Deenan, C.C., San Diego, J., & Gibson, D.C. (2016). Technology enhanced formative assessment for 21st century learning. Educational Technology and Society, 19(3), 58-71.
Stobart, G. (2006). The validity of formative assessment. In Garder, J. (Ed.), Assessment and Learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Szendey, olivia;et al. (2020). Virtual Learning Environments and Digital tools impementing Formative Assessment and Transversal Slills in STEM. Dublin City University: ISBN: 978-1-911669-14-2.
Timmers, C.F., Walraven, A., & Veldkamp, B.P. (2015). The effect of regulation feedback in computer-based formative assessment on information problem solving. Computers & Education, 87, 1-9.
Van De Ven, A. (1992). Suggestions for Studying Strategy Process: A Research Note. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S1), 169-188.
van Dijk, A.M., & Lazonder, A. (2016). Scaffolding students’ use of learner-generated content in a technology-enhanced inquiry learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(1), 194-204.
Vogelzang, J., & Admiraal, W.F. (2017). Classroom action research on formative assessment in a context-based chemistry course. ducational Action Research, 25(1), 155-166.
Wiliam, D. (2016). The secret of effective feedback. Educational Leadership, 73(7), 10-15.
Wiliam, D. (2019). Why formative assessment is always both domain-general and domain-specific and what matters is the balance between the two. In H. Andrade, R.E. Bennett, & G. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment in the disciplines (pp. 243-264). New York, NY: Routledge.
Wiliam, D., & Black, P. (1996). Meanings and consequences: A basis for distinguishing formative and summative functions of assessment? British Educational Research Journal, 22(5), 537-548.
Wiliam, D., & Thompson, M. (2007). Integrating assessment with learning: What will it take to make it work? In C.A. Dwyer (Ed.), The future of assessment: Shaping teaching and learning. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Wiliam, D., Lee, C., Harrison, C., & Black, P. (2004). Teachers developing assessment for learning: impact on student achievement. Assessment in Education, 11(1), 49-65.
Wiliam, D; Thompson.M;. (2007). Integrating assessment with learning: What will it take to make it work? New York: In C.A. Dwyer(Ed.), The future of assessment: Shaping teaching and learning
